Skip to content

R-Motion vs TruNatomy

FKG Dentaire · Dentsply Sirona

TR

R-Motion®

FKG Dentaire

Swiss Precision Reciprocation

View protocol →

TruNatomy®

Dentsply Sirona

True, Natural, Anatomy

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: R-Motion vs TruNatomy
R-MotionTruNatomy
ManufacturerFKG DentaireDentsply Sirona
AlloyHeat-Treated NiTiHeat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentOtherOther
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files76
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionRounded triangularOff-centered parallelogram, Centered parallelogram (2 cutting edges)
Speed500 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

R-Motion

minimally invasive reciprocationlower dentine stresswide curvature accommodation

TruNatomy

dentin preservationconservative accessminimally invasive

Key Features

R-Motion

Thinner core and optimized tip for lower dentine stress with manufacturer-reported 3.6x cyclic fatigue resistance

TruNatomy

Slim 0.8mm MFD with off-centered parallelogram cross-section preserves peri-cervical dentin while maintaining shaping efficiency