Skip to content

TruNatomy vs 2Shape

Dentsply Sirona · Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

TR

TruNatomy®

Dentsply Sirona

True, Natural, Anatomy

View protocol →

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: TruNatomy vs 2Shape
TruNatomy2Shape
ManufacturerDentsply SironaMicro-Mega (COLTENE)
AlloyHeat-Treated NiTiT.Wire Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentOtherOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files64
TaperVariable.04, .06
Cross-sectionOff-centered parallelogram, Centered parallelogram (2 cutting edges)Asymmetrical triple helix
Speed500 RPM250 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm2–2.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

TruNatomy

dentin preservationconservative accessminimally invasive

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

Key Features

TruNatomy

Slim 0.8mm MFD with off-centered parallelogram cross-section preserves peri-cervical dentin while maintaining shaping efficiency

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment