Skip to content

ProTaper Next vs 2Shape

Dentsply Sirona · Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

TR

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ProTaper Next vs 2Shape
ProTaper Next2Shape
ManufacturerDentsply SironaMicro-Mega (COLTENE)
AlloyM-Wire NiTiT.Wire Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentM-WireOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files64
TaperVariable.04, .06
Cross-sectionConvex triangular, Off-centered rectangularAsymmetrical triple helix
Speed300 RPM250 RPM
Torque2 Ncm2–2.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

Key Features

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment