Skip to content

TruNatomy vs ZenFlex

Dentsply Sirona · Kerr Dental

TR

TruNatomy®

Dentsply Sirona

True, Natural, Anatomy

View protocol →

ZenFlex™

Kerr Dental

Controlled Memory Precision

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Both aim at conservative shaping at 500 RPM. TruNatomy uses regressive tapers with a 0.8 mm maximum flute diameter and a uniform 1.5 Ncm across its Glider and Small/Prime/Medium/Large files; ZenFlex uses constant .04/.06 tapers with a 1 mm flute diameter, controlled-memory wire and torque set per file. Choose TruNatomy for the slimmer regressive design and single setting, ZenFlex for constant-taper size selection and pre-bendability.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: TruNatomy vs ZenFlex
TruNatomyZenFlex
ManufacturerDentsply SironaKerr Dental
AlloyHeat-Treated NiTiHeat-Treated NiTi (Controlled Memory)
Heat TreatmentOtherCM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files610
TaperVariable4%, 6%
Cross-sectionOff-centered parallelogram, Centered parallelogram (2 cutting edges)Triangular
Speed500 RPM500 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1–3.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

TruNatomy

dentin preservationconservative accessminimally invasive

ZenFlex

minimally invasive shapingcontrolled-memory flexibilitydual taper strategy (.04/.06)

Key Features

TruNatomy

Slim 0.8mm MFD with off-centered parallelogram cross-section preserves peri-cervical dentin while maintaining shaping efficiency

ZenFlex

Violet oxide surface with 1mm flute diameter for minimally invasive shaping and excellent flexibility